Maby thare could be more types of tnt like ones that are stronger or ones that cause fire or ones that can stick to walls when ignited and a “nuke” that when explodes it has a mushroom cloud and has the wither effect inside of the balst crater for 20 mc days and has a blast radius of 50 blocks
29 Comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.
-
Nukes in Minecraft? Not a reasonable request, bud.
nice
Macu are you some kind of critic in every post that I have seen you it is you saying that thare idea is bad even if it is a good one
MachhuPicchu is pretty conservative about what he thinks should be added to Minecraft. But in this case, I absolutely agree with him. This game does not need a nuke... And you're going to have to convince me why TNT isn't enough, especially with the amount of different things that you can do with it.
Yes, TNT doesn't stick to walls because it becomes a gravity block once it's ignited. But it's also really easy to put a dirt block underneath it (or a leaf block if you want something with super low blast resistance).
Why do you need a stronger explosive? Why do you need an explosive that also causes fires? And why especially do you need a freaking nuke that has a blast radius of 120 blocks and leaves the area uninhabitable for 20 minecraft days?!!
Wops I meant 50 blocks
And in most of the posts i have read the comments on machu has had a negative comment
The fire tnt for not destroying with explosives but with fire
And the sticky tnt so not needing to place a block for canes of tnt that whoud destroy the block while igniting
And for the nuke juest cause it whoud be cool for pvp
And for clearing land
Hi Ethan! Yes, I am a critic, but there is nothing wrong with that, is there? If I see a good idea, I tell the author their idea is good, and why it is good. If I see a bad idea, I tell the author their idea is bad, and why it is bad. I usually have very good reasons for not liking certain ideas. Perhaps you should carefully consider what I write instead of being upset at me for disliking ideas you think are cool :)
Sorry if I seamed rude
I was juest wondering
Please formulate your replies into one post. This isn't texting where it works to just add message after message. There's also an edit button if you remember something later.
Ok, for destroying blocks with fire, why can't you use a flint and steel? It starts fires very effectively, and starting a few in a flammable area is all you need to get things going. Minecraft isn't about adding new blocks for every tiny little application, it's about applying what you have to the problem at hand.
The nuke you describe, even only with a 50 block radius, would be overpowered for both PVP and land clearing. It's a lot more fun to set a lot of TNT and have it blow up in a chain reaction anyways.
I juest haven’t Seen a positive comment from you
Here are a few of my favorite ideas, Ethan. Ideas that I like do exist :P
https://feedback.minecraft.net/hc/en-us/community/posts/360016527451-Anvil-overhaul-and-Hammers-
O ya I explained my power generation idea better it will make it make more sense
Ethan, I commented a list of my favorite ideas, but it will only show up on Monday. Check back then
Ok
Way way way too op.
Well I see this as more of an item for maps, such as fallout maps. I’d love this as I’m working on one. A problem I see though is that it would screw the game and probably crash it.
Also, sticky tnt really isn’t needed. Just put a trapdoor under it.
It wouldn’t crash the game. I modded a nuke once that had a radius of 300 blocks and it didn’t crash. Beyond that, though, the computer would go down in flames (and explosions).
Of course, minecraft wont do that
I mean, there are mods for this and you could just stack TNT Blocks on top of each other to make a bigger explosion.
What the recipe for the Nuke is what I want to know.
I agree
I agree, I think a nuke block should do a lot more damage though
Great idea. Have same wish.
sounds destructive
Post a new comment: