X

NOTICE

Are you sure you want to report this?

Minecraft has a lot of blocks, but what if they had more? Why do we need them? Please don't just add lists of things - these will be marked as spam and removed! Also, no furniture, guns, or vertical/"sideways"/"upright"/"standing" slabs (yes, we see you).

31

The Archeology Brush doesn't quite "mesh" with Vanilla

9 Comments

Post a new comment:

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Sorted by oldest
  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I dont want archeology, it doesn't feel like minecraft and kinda would the minecraft vibe for me.

  • 6
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Another note: if we're adding a brush to the game, it should get the same treatment as any other new tool, and it needs to be more useful that just for the archeology part of the game.

    • If added, brushes should turn path blocks to dirt, grass to dirt, remove some of copper's corrosion, etc. Maybe using them on furry animals like cows, sheep, horses, dogs, etc. heals them.

    They need to integrate better with the game and its mechanics, same as for shears or any other tool.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    yeah i didnt really think the whole archeology thing fit that well. I thought the whole concept and everything surrounding it was weird. maybe in education edition but not minecraft.

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Unpopular opinion from me i guess XD i like archeology especially since the brush texture will change to be more minecrafty

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    the old pottery shards would probably look better if they look like clay tablets (by this I mean that they would look better and also fit better into the game if they were more rectangular)

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    also maybe make teirs for the brushes

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    It appears there is either already an existing thread on this topic (or something very similar), it's a list of items/mobs/ideas, contains a previously rejected idea, is a bug or support issue, exists, or it is too general and is being removed by our team.  Please check out this link (https://feedback.minecraft.net/hc/en-us/articles/360004442111-Creating-Great-Ideas), be sure to use search, and join existing threads in progress (we read ALL the comments). Thanks!

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Thanks for bringing back the post in the right category :-)

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Yes, I wholeheartedly agree. For me, when they were introducing archeology I was expecting something like new structures that would spawn partly buried under ground and you could dig around them to unearth the structure. With chests inside maybe the clay pot shards could be found only in those chest and that would be neat... But the way mojang presented archeology seemed(sorry mojang) quite awefull. To be honest first of all it looked like a cheesy mod, wich I understand appearence would change, and second of all the mechanics dont feel "Vanilla-y" at all. Im quite dissapointed with this feature and while certain parts of the feature could be cool if worked on, the other parts are just not very minecraft-like. I'm shure i'm not the only one that feels like this please help me think of more ideas to hopefully correct this new feature before it changes the minecraft we love in a negative way.