Discuss Minecraft Add-Ons and how they change or expand gameplay, worlds, mobs, items, and more. If you'd like to see an existing mod come to Bedrock, please contact its creator and encourage them to explore the Add-On API (http://aka.ms/minecraftaddons). Requests for specific mods, feature lists, bugs, and support issues will be removed. Marketplace Category is best for mashup and copyrighted content requests.

← Add-ons
84
Follow

A decent add-on API documentation

I really don't like the basic API docs in a Wiki. If you're serious about this, you document this on a good, developer-oriented, web site.

Avatar
Registered User shared this idea

6 Comments

Post a new comment:

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Date Votes
Sorted by oldest
  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I like this idea, It should be more in depth and show screen-shot examples on all use cases and possible values that something can have in an add-on there also needs to be resource pack documentation.

    Source examples on every add-on component an value,

     

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Where do I find the API's

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I would definitely like this idea. When I started trying to develop Add-ons, the whole documentation was not very beginner-friendly, and I still haven't made any complete ones(import failing every time). I feel like, since this is something Minecraft seems to be prioritising, it should be more optimised for developers, especially for newcomers. At the very least have all the downloadable .zip templates complete with all code(features have been available for a while now and still have not been added to the starting code, and as a result I still haven't figured them out).

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    yea, the documentation is unbearable for such a big product

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I'd settle for documentation which was up-to-date and accurate, but this would be even better.

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    And the current documentation is also outdated and incomplete, making it even worse than just a wiki styled documentation. :/