Share your thoughts on features being tested in the latest Bedrock Edition Beta and Preview. Keep in mind that not everything may be available, fully functional, or released as tested. General gameplay suggestions and feature requests belong to other categories.

1760

Revert Change to Chains or Add Alternative

245 Comments

Post a new comment:

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Sorted by oldest
  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Fxxk u,mojang,why do you change this

  • 6
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    If an organization gets disconnected from the people, it's bound to fail.

    ----Mao Zedong

    If Mojang doesn't learn its lesson, every player in our community will make sure you do!

    Since you didn't really think about its function when you designed the mechanism, and in the end you had to change it, it caused thousands of players' efforts in the game to go to waste. Today we're only talking about the issues with iron chains and copper chains. As long as you don't make this change, everything's still fine. But if not, you'll have to face a new storm of public opinion, a people's storm made up of millions of community players. This is not a threat, but an inevitability that history has proven countless times. If Mojang refuses to even acknowledge historical facts, then what reason do we have to let those who are ideologically incapable of serving the people serve the players?

    Our demands are very clear, DO NOT MAKE THIS CHANGE.

    I've already put it very tactfully. If you really do make this fxxking change, I will intensify my firepower and criticize thoroughly and denounce utterly you bourgeois reactionaries(“批倒批臭”)

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    不要改,这对我们很重要

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Without doubt, this update will strike a blow against the inventory‑industry community and machines in Bedrock Edition. Fixing this issue would suppress players' creativity, and it will make the Bedrock redstone community’s work even more challenging. This is especially true considering that development on such machines in Java Edition is far more advanced than in Bedrock Edition. It is believed that our energetic communities are very important to the game. So please think more thoroughly, and we would very happy if you could take advice from players.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    链条被视为固体方块、允许比较器透过它读取容器,这个机制已经存在多年,很多技术设计都依赖它。直接改动会导致大量装置失效,而且没有其他方块能替代。希望官方能回退这个改动。
    I completely agree. Chains being treated as a solid block and allowing comparators to read containers through them has been a mechanic for years, and many technical designs rely on it. Changing it directly would break a huge number of builds, and no other block can replace this behavior.(translate by AI)

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    不要改😡😡😭😭

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    If a game is not intended for leisure and pleasure, but waste the leisure time of players who also have busy studies and works out of gaming, then it is a bad game that makes no sense.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Ion know much but smart people sad its bad if you remove it so its bad 😡😡😡

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    ojng 如果你改的话,你就真成ojng了
    本来没有个刷TNT机就已经够气恼了
    你再让我们的其他机器报废的话我和你没完
    If you make this change, you’ll really become ojng.
    We were already frustrated enough without the TNT duping machine.
    If you break our other redstone machines too, I will not let this go.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

     不许改

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    改了我们生电玩家用什么😡😡😡

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    说真的,作为基岩版玩家,这个修改造成的负面影响我认为是非常大的 ,修改它没有任何意义而且会使在它基础上的很多机器直接炸掉
    原来的机制真的很不错
    我们已经失去了很多优秀性质了,留下这个基岩版特性吧

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    说句实在的,我也知道建筑党可能需要链条坐垫,但是问题在于我们也需要视为完整方块的不完整方块
    视为完整方块的链条对整个红石电路的贡献是极大的分类设计完善,你要似了我去哪找

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Do not change it😡😡😡

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    bug jump, I rember you~[music]

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Don't change this mechanism. It's too important to us.

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    NOOOOO

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    我们不希望这个机制被改变。

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    mj是死了多少个妈才想出来的修复这个玩意

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    请不要将一些有利于游戏发展的东西视为bug

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Please do not make changes. Thank you.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    这项修改只会限制玩家的创造力,原本的机器将无法正常工作。不希望链条被修改。

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    ojang.i don't care you can understand it,i just want u know one thing:make redstone machines in BEDROCK is more difficult than JAVA edition.So,don't try to change this,OK?

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    傻逼微软稳定发挥

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Vote for us! It's very IMPORTANT for bedrock redstone players!

    为我们投票!这对基岩版生电玩家很重要!

    為我們投票!這對基岩版紅石玩家很重要!

    私たちに投票してください!それはBedrockレッドストーン勢にとってとても重要です!

    Votez pour nous ! C'est très important pour les joueurs de redstone sur Bedrock !

    ¡Voten por nosotros! ¡Es muy importante para los jugadores de redstone de Bedrock!

    Votem em nós! É muito importante para os jogadores de redstone do Bedrock!

    Проголосуйте за нас! Это очень важно для игроков в редстоун на Bedrock!

    Hãy bình chọn cho chúng tôi! Điều này rất quan trọng đối với người chơi redstone trên Bedrock!

    저희에게 투표해 주세요! 이는 Bedrock 레드스톤 플레이어들에게 매우 중요합니다!

    Stimmt für uns ab! Das ist sehr wichtig für Bedrock-Redstone-Spieler!

    Rösta på oss! Det är väldigt viktigt för Bedrock-redstone-spelare!

    โหวตให้เรานะ! มันสำคัญมากสำหรับผู้เล่นเรดสโตนบน Bedrock!

    Bize oy verin! Bu, Bedrock redstone oyuncuları için çok önemli!

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Please mojang?, just revert the changes... Countless systems and tech fail to work because of this one change.. The amount of knowledge.. Hours.. Dedication it took to make a tech is just.. Alot mojang.. I hope you'll understand.. We love Minecraft.. Keep it as it is.. We.. Us players will be forever glad.. Thanks mojang.. Please consider it and ignore the hate your getting.. Your game is great...Sincerely from your Minecraft player

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Mojang do you listen to any of your fanbase? If it gonna be treated as a transparent block will break redstone systems that alot of worlds rely on, please don't change this, listen to your fanbase

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    🀄💀🐴
    🖕😡🖕

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Please do NOT add this! It would devastate the technical community!

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    别改!