When you are making your redstone suggestions, please note that Java and Bedrock will not have the exact same the same redstone systems - this would require redoing redstone system completely on one platform or the other. The two systems are functionally different and are going to stay that way. Please be sure to tag your suggestions with (Java) or (Bedrock).

← Redstone
3
Follow

BUD Block (Java & Bedrock)

Everyone knows that quazi connectivity is a bug, and technically shouldn't exist. Java players want this to stay, and bedrock players want it. Mojang can't add a "bug" into Bedrock, or remove the bug on Java, because it would take half the community with it. So basically, it's a stalemate, and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. UNLESS! Maybe instead of removing it entirely we replace it with a "Feature" that does the same thing and added to both versions. I present to you, the BUD block, this block would replace the Redstone block/other power source and would do the same thing quazi connectivity would do, power a Redstone component two blocks away, when that Redstone component receives a block update. That way, you don't have to change anything for the designs of already created Redstone machines and just replace the power source with a BUD block. With this all versions can have quazi connectivity.
Avatar
Registered User shared this idea

3 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Date Votes
Sorted by oldest
  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I'm not the best at Redstone so if I got any of this stuff wrong plz tell me so I can correct it. Thank you!

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    maybe not one BUD block, but maybe an ability to make some components do this BUD feature by adding somthing to it. Or vice versa: add this "bug" to bedrock, than add an ability to make some componets BUD-proof. For example, by adding an ametist shard to redstone dust makes it BUD-proof -- it can't BUD pistons, droppers and other stuff. BUD block will be not very practical

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I see where you are coming from, but I disagree, I think it would be more complicated to add different modes to EVERY Redstone component. I think it would be more convenient to just have one bud power source, and one bud block to act as Redstone dust that will enable Quazi connectivity to the redstone components it is powering. That's why I thought it would be best for a block instead, but thank you for your feedback, I appreciate it!