Sign in
Skip to main content

Parity means making features behave consistently across different Minecraft editions, most commonly between Minecraft: Java Edition and Minecraft: Bedrock Edition. Use this category to discuss released features that exist in both versions of the game but work differently. Please note that bugs are not parity issues and should be reported separately.

54

parity update

6 Comments

Post a new comment:

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Sorted by oldest
  • 6
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I would like to apologize to you, I literally just posted a Parity update idea, and was sure that no one had done it yet, I even checked before hand, but then I just saw yours and I feel stupid, sorry for inadvertently stealing your idea, but also COMPLETELY AGREE, not for 1.19 but maybe 1.20, but it should 100% happen

  • 10
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    PLEASE vote people so that this can happen. :))))))

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    It's an okay idea but java players might find it bland

  • 5
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I completely agree. There are so many features missing from the edition I play (java), like dyeable shulkers and waterlogged repeaters and it frustrates me. And I am sure Bedrock players can find other things missing from their edition that frustrates them.

     

    Mojang, please make a parity update.

  • 4
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I play on bedrock mainly, and I always see other people doing cool java only things, and sometimes I just wish those features were on bedrock.  And when I do play java, I always miss some of the bedrock exclusive features

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I was having some ideas for a redstone update, merge some features of bedrock and java, for example in bedrock the redstone connects directly with pistons, observers etc.. but there is no possibility for the redstone to load blocks indirectly... That only happens in Java by merging these two options. I think the quasi-connectivity bug could be completely eliminated.

    I'm not a programmer and I have many ideas to improve the redstone but I don't know how to explain it...