Parity means making features behave consistently across different Minecraft editions, most commonly between Minecraft: Java Edition and Minecraft: Bedrock Edition. Use this category to discuss released features that exist in both versions of the game but work differently. Please note that bugs are not parity issues and should be reported separately.

← Parity
9
Follow

Armor Enchantments Compatability

What I am suggesting is that certain armor enchantments (e.g: Fire Protection and Protection) should be compatible together. I do not understand why we cannot have all the types of Protections on our armor at once. I think that should be a feature in either version 1.15, or an upcoming version if you consider this. I hope you consider this, and good day or night or whatever time it is. Goodbye. *EDIT*: I think that if this does get implemented, there should only be certain levels available for it. Like, up to level 1 if you have all the protections, level 2 if you are missing 1, and level 3 if you are missing 2 or 3.

Avatar
Registered User shared this idea

7 Comments

Post a new comment:

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Date Votes
Sorted by oldest
  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    There's a reason why the types of Protection enchantments are not compatible. It's because with all of them on the armor the player would be technically invincible.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    You can do it through commands.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    You actually CAN’T do it through commands, and I was talking about for bedrock edition, where the commands are limited.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    AndrewS0N 1.14 is the name of it for the Java version not bedrock

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Smh... I use bedrock edition, not java edition

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    This needs to be in the Parity category otherwise no one is gonna think that this is necessary.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Oh. Well, now it has been moved.