(Feedback site, meta) More questions on what constitutes good feedback
I've noticed several posts on this website that I feel have no place here, and I want to bring them up in order to continue the discussion of what constitutes good feedback.
- There's one post here that asks that Minecraft be available for free, which is a ridiculous and completely infeasible demand from an economic point of view.
- There is another post that asks for accounts with "OG" usernames to be forcibly renamed or deleted in order to make those usernames available to "more active players". This is not only quite unfair, but likely illegal.
- There are at least two posts asking for the inclusion of outside brands to Minecraft (one asking for Marvel content and another asking for Lamborghini cars). These are unwise choices from an economic and stylistic viewpoint and would be terrible for the game's image.
In my opinion, none of these ideas should be allowed on the site; I think they barely qualify as feedback, much less good feedback. What is the official stance on these kinds of ideas?
By the way, I do hope I don't come across as arrogant here, because I haven't always followed the guidelines perfectly either. Several of my posts are much longer than the recommended 250 words, and I am grateful that you tolerate it :)
Best to you and the rest of the team.
Please sign in to leave a comment.