When you are making your redstone suggestions, please note that Java and Bedrock will not have the exact same the same redstone systems - this would require redoing redstone system completely on one platform or the other. The two systems are functionally different and are going to stay that way. Please be sure to tag your suggestions with (Java) or (Bedrock).

← Redstone
24
Follow

in defence of quazi connectivity

okay, there are probably tonnes of posts about this, but here i want to bring up a point to counter the reason the devs don't want to implement quazi connectivity as a feature. they say its a bug used only for detecting block updates, which isn't the case. sure it can be confusing and a little counter intuitive, but it has a logic, and along with timing changes to "ticks" has ruined a lot of redstone contraptions that have been converted from console editions and broken creations that all users of bedrock (especially the targeted young audience) have tried to build from tutorials. if the new modding api has some way to add it in as a mod without adding it to the main game then thats fine. heck it could even be a free store item so everyone could use it.

Avatar
Registered User shared this idea

1 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Date Votes
Sorted by oldest
  • 4
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Even if it is a bug, it is a bug that the redstone community considers essential, and it allows for more interesting tricks and devices. I suspect a lot of people would fully move to bedrock if quasi and pistons spitting out blocks were available. It just gives the system more depth. Observers were meant to fill the gap but they are used in an entirely different way than quasi is.