This category is for feedback/ideas related to the Minecraft franchise, not gameplay. No support issues, lists of general ideas, or bug posts please!

3

Armadillos pose actual health risk to children due to carrying diseases

4 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Sorted by oldest
  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    In that case, r3move half of the game's mobs. Bats and wolves have rabies. Farm animals can carry diseases. We just have to assume such conditions don't exist in MC to keep them all in.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Yeah, they could carry diseases, but with armadillos it's a situation where if you're near a wild one, there's like a 75% chance that you're going to get leprosy. Not to mention, they're extremely common in the southern US and are an animal not really thought of as dangerous, so there's an even higher chance of somebody getting sick.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    The Pangolin would be a cool mob to add. It gives me ocelot vibes as, if the pangolin was added to minecraft, people would associate the animal with minecraft because you don’t really hear much about them, similar to the ocelot. I hope this makes sense 

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I also agree that the Armadillo shouldn’t be added in the game for the same reasons that have been said. It’s a bit hypocritical that Mojang removed Fireflies because they are poisonous to Frogs if they eat them and then, a couple of years later, they add a mob that carries deadly diseases. I think Mojang should remove the Armadillo completely or add Fireflies as well as the Armadillo. Fireflies would be a cool ambient mob to have in the game too.