This category is for Realms and dedicated server feedback. Please send support issues to help.mojang.com, as support posts, bugs, and individual server issues will be removed. Remember that when it comes to "adding more servers" or realm restrictions we are constrained by the rules of the various platforms Minecraft is available on. Thanks!

882

Realms Should Have More Player Count & Yearly Subscription Options

under review

41 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Sorted by oldest
  • 13
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Imagine the HermitCraft server being a realm...

  • 15
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I think the prices could be cheaper for year-long realms, but the rest fit in OK.

  • 18
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    5 player realms. 2 players doesn't justify a realm and 10 is more than most people have. 5 would make a value option for families and outcasts like me with few friends.

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    The new setup on Xbox renewals just does not work. 30 days with auto-renew does not work for me. We need to have long term renewal on Xbox of 6-months or 1-year and the option to turn auto-renew on or off. I am attempting to set up realms on Windows 10 which has a better format, but there have been issues with creation. For me the 30-day auto renewal is a serious issue.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I've never seen a 30yr option (not that I know 30 trustworthy ppl) 

    2019 now (perhaps index here but to what?)

    In these times of tight budgets, I think those price points are in or around the ball park and it is.  A 6 month 30 would be a stretch would be interesting to see if some good realms could stay filled with that capacity.  I think the issue for Microsoft / Mojang is whether they can they make azure efficient enough to provide a stable, lag-free experience for all players at that price point?

     

    A worthy challenge considering issues that we seem to be having with chunk loading, etc under load although I'm not sure that they've actually migrated from Mojang's (aws?) to azure yet..

  • 4
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    30 Players, 30 Days -> 11.99 

    Looks like good idea but good value.

  • 8
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    We just need servers in bedrock in general

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Larger Private Realms sounds like a great idea. (we have 3 families with a 2-4 players each family plus some friends) 

    - 30 Player seems plenty large enough, but I cannot find how to get this for a Bedrock Windows 10 Edition of Realms

     

    Discounted rates for longer commitment also a good idea,

    we get better rates and you get longer commitments

  • 5
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    There should be a 5 player realm

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    sounds awesome i mean i have a realm and i have to keep renewing it but if this was added i would not have to renew it

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I've spent more time trying to get into realms then playing them, i wish play count could be 20+ players. Like Droidcraft I've played for 3 hrs and waited for 7 hrs. This Sucks!

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Gute Idee

     

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    also add it for realms plus

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    it should go up to however much you want

     

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Maybe there could also be a permanent version 10 players $75-100 20 15 players 100-115 for bedrock

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Currently October 2020 and they seem to be going backwards as they removed the 6month option for Bedrock Realms and you can only renew monthly. Well that is how you lose a customer. When my current realms expire I am not renewing. Tell whatever executive made that decision that they need to find another job.

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Definitely. If I am paying 25 for 6 months I want at least 30 people being able to be on at once.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I have been waiting for this for years. I have a massive realm and it would help so much, and if one day we could have 100 players on at a time that would just be great

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    And with that update they should increase Realms render distance!

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I mean I agree with this but like as many players as you pay for 

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    We need 30 player realms

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    30 player realms need to be a thing

     

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    rlly needs to be a thing

     

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Considering how much profit the company makes overall I think all realm prices should be lowered in general, but that is kind of a different conversation.

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    ich bin ein aktive Realm Nutzer der ein 10 Abo Realm hat, ich finde das ist eine tolle Idee aber wenn man sich mit Server gut auskennt weiß man das mehr Spieler auch mehr Ram brauchen und das kann Inns Geld gehen allein der 10er Abo Realm hat nur 1-2 Ram und das ist für manche vorhaben zu wenig. es wehre auch cool wenn man auch die Option hat mehr Ram zu kaufen.

     

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    As a huge realm owner, having this would be amazing. From my point of view I couldnt care what the price was. Realms have been needing this for a while. My opinion is we take baby steps and start at 15-20 until we figure out lag situations. Really would love to see this added and I think you would have a big community move back into realms - E5

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    microsoft uses amazon cloud services to host realms so u really think that can handle a 30 player realm lmfao

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I feel like the prices could be raised a bit because it does take a lot for them to be hosted especially 30 players that would be a lot of people to have on any realm and if it was super cheap then we would always have problems with those realms so I agree with all this but the prices for some of them need to be raised especially for the yearly and monthly 30 players cause that’s cheap for a year of realms, also if there was an option for a custom realm meaning to edit the player amount and time by doing like it u want 7 players for a month the price would be a set base price per player for a custom package

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Great idea cant wait till this happens!!!

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    make 100 it will be pog