Sign in
Skip to main content

Share your thoughts on features being tested in the latest Java Edition Snapshot. Keep in mind that not everything may be available, fully functional, or released as tested. General gameplay suggestions and feature requests belong in other categories.

← Java Edition Snapshots
13
Follow

(villager rebalances) Biome specific trades as a world creation option

I always play with mobGriefing False and some of the rebalances to villagers, especially the changes to Librarians, are gonna really mess with how I play as villagers can not be breed when mobGriefing is false. The best solution I can think if to have a toggle during world creation of whether you want trades to be random or tied to biomes. That way the people who want this feature and the people don't want the feature can both get play how they prefer

Avatar
Registered User shared this idea

2 Comments

Post a new comment:

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Date Votes
Sorted by oldest
  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    This is what I'm saying, and I agree. It's not going to solve any balancing issues, it's only going to make balancing worse. Especially since swamps can be 1000s of blocks away, and diamonds are not renewable. This is not a good change overall, especially not for multiplayer.

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Adding a gamerule for the trade rebalance is a great move, but it should definitely be disabled by default. Forcing players to 'enable cheats' just to get the classic trading back feels wrong. It’s much better to let those who want the extra challenge opt-in manually, rather than making everyone else feel like they’re cheating just to play the way they’re used to. Forcing this change is like making the world flat by default—it completely changes how the game works and breaks the traditional progression. It has to be an option, not a forced rule.