Welcome to the launcher category! Please do not post bugs and support issues here, they will be removed.

3

Minecraft Web Client

6 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Sorted by oldest
  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I agree that Minecraft needs a web client. I would suggest that the web client be based off of Babylon.js and support WebXR. This would also support the Microsoft brand, since Babylon.js is an open source project sponsored by Microsoft.

    Additionally, the client should be source available, so that the community build mods.

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    minecraft premium does not exists and that would give you less fps

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    minecraft isn't going to do this because it would just be very difficult to have enough servers for everyone like they probably already have enough problems with realms and minecraft bedrock multiplayer as a whole but making a webclient is difficult because minecraft java is resource intensive and it would be somewhat simple to make webclient code but it's a lot of processing and if they did this it would probably be at the price of a singleplayer realm plus some more

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    EagleCraft is also pirated and has been DMCAed

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    yeah, I can understand why you feel that way, but maybe having a premium subscription would be a bit much. I think if you already have the game, you should have a web client for free. I saw someone said it would get less FPS, but it would probably get streamed from a server or something.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    and they already brought it to chromebooks anyway