Back to minecraft.net

When you are making your redstone suggestions, please note that Java and Bedrock will not have the exact same the same redstone systems - this would require redoing redstone system completely on one platform or the other. The two systems are functionally different and are going to stay that way. Please be sure to tag your suggestions with (Java) or (Bedrock).

← Redstone
126
Follow

redstone under water

you should be able to place redstone under water on the bedrock version

 

Avatar
Registered User shared this idea

13 Comments

Please sign in to leave a comment.

Date Votes
Sorted by oldest
  • 4
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Would be nice to be able to do that

  • 3
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Why only on bedrock 

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    You technically already can in bedrock. Just use repeaters. It's a good compromise I'd say. Also it wouldn't make any sense to be able to place dust in water without it being washed away 

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    why not on java

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    You do realize that Java doesn't have this right?

  • 5
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Change it so that Java can also get this experience. It's not fair that one edition of the game gets more then the other.

  • 8
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I don’t think it should be placeable underwater. It’s a dust and water would just scatter that dust as it already does. However, I would like to see something like a redstone pipe that is placeable underwater, along with the various redstone components such as repeaters and comparators also having pipe versions that aren’t affected by water. They should be more expensive than normal redstone though.

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    also in java version .

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    Like maybe an aquastone instead of redstone, found in caves in water biomes

  • 1
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    You can do it in caves and cliffs because you can place detector rails underwater right?

  • 2
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    I think if redstone could go underwater maybe you would combine it with something though, like copper since that is used for wirring irl.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    This would definitely be a nice quality of life change when building near water especially when you consider how useful water is in redstone for moving items. It’s unrealistic but realism shouldn’t take this much priority over quality of life especially when its not even that weird.

  • 0
    Registered User commented
    Comment actions Permalink

    on java you cannot place any redstone underwater so it makes sense to have redstone dust to be placed underwater on bedrock since other redstone things can